Saturday, 31 December 2016

Unite Alberta’s Right - New Year Resolution #1

Here’s a New Year prediction for you - 2017 will go down as one of the most pivotal years in Alberta’s history. It will be the year that our province’s two centre-right parties decide whether to unite their forces to fundamentally alter the direction of our province for decades of prosperity; or it will be the year those same two parties allowed ego and short-sightedness to seal our province’s fate as Canada’s next great debt-ridden, job hemorrhaging, have-not province.

I am not going to sugar coat this. If you consider yourself a supporter of fiscal responsibility, free markets and individual liberty, this is the year to step forward and do something about it. I’m going to give you 3 reasons why helping to unite Alberta’s right should be your #1 New Year’s resolution.

#1 – Defeating the NDP

Alberta’s NDP Government has been a complete disaster. Their socialist policies – from higher taxes and carbon penalties levelled on our struggling energy industry, to new and higher taxes on Alberta’s greatest job creators and innovators, to skyrocketing deficit financing, to raising energy, fuel and other costs for every Alberta family in the midst of the worst recession in a decade – you name the ignorant policy and the NDP has found a way to implement it. 

8 years of Premier Notley? It's entirely possible
The result has been predictable – they have caused what should have been a short and mild economic correction for our province into a full blown economic recession and crisis threatening to turn into a provincial depression; all while our provincial neighbours and the US economy prosper and grow.

But if you think that just because Premier Notley and crew have blown it so badly that they will be sent packing at the next election (likely in 2019 or 2020), you had better think again.

Despite having a disapproval rating approaching 60%, the NDP remains consistently entrenched at 30-35% in public opinion polls with the distinct possibility of climbing closer to their 2015 election vote of 40%...meaning (gasp)...the NDP could very well win another term in office. If they do, our economy will never recover. Talk to any director or senior manager of any oil and gas company - large or small – they’ll say the same thing. If this is a one term NDP fluke, they’ll stay put and ride it out as best they can. If it’s back-to-back NDP governments, downtown Calgary and rural Alberta will turn into permanent ghost towns.  

So how could the NDP, despite their utter economic incompetence, still win a second term? It’s actually quite simple. While conservatives in the Wildrose and PC parties continue to fight old battles, protect their fiefdoms, demonize one another for past grievances and split their support essentially down the middle between them (both with significantly damaged brands), the Left in this province is entirely unified. The majority of public sector union workers, special interest groups, the chronically clueless and the mainstream urban media are united and more organized than they have ever been previously - and Rachel Notley (who I know quite well) - is a very likeable and decent person. 

The Left's Public Enemy #1 - Jason Kenney
The end result is simple enough. If the PCs and Wildrose continue their not so civil war, the NDP has a clear path to another victory in 2019 or 2020 despite being supported by a minority of voters. If conservatives are united, the NDP doesn’t stand a chance – and they and their media allies know it; which is why you should expect the demonization of any person or group committed to the cause of conservative unity.

#2 – Long Term Conservative Governance

Party stalwarts with both the PCs and Wildrose will often bring up plausible victory scenarios for their respective parties that do not involve party unification. And they are correct – obviously there is a path to power that doesn’t involve a peace deal. The problem with this idea is two-fold.

Firstly, that “path” likely involves watering down policies to appeal to centre-left leaning voters and interests; and/or secondly, that “path” likely results in minority or very weak majority PC or Wildrose governments that will be either scared or unable to implement the economic and other conservative reforms necessary to getting our province back on track.

Look, if the Stelmach-Redford-Prentice governments taught us anything it is this; a middle of the road, try and appeal to everyone coalition, in Alberta at least, is not sustainable in the long term. There simply is not enough common ground on economic and social policy to unify such a coalition in any meaningful way…not to mention the budgetary hole created by trying to keep such a coalition happy and well fed.  

Equally ineffective is the Wildrose approach, whose often strident ideological positions made for a very effective opposition party, but (with the help of media distortion) resulted in a forfeiture of the support of entire segments of the population needed for a strong governing conservative majority – including many natural conservative allies in our province’s ethnic communities and among younger libertarians. At election time, these groups either remained PC or stayed home.

So here is the question – without a strong, united, pro-free market and fiscal conservative coalition in government, how is any party going to be able to implement a reduction in taxes and spending? How can any party balance the budget and implement desperately needed health care reforms when spending addicted special interest groups and public sector unions continue to hold the balance of power, even in a post NDP world?

The solution is straight forward – we need to change the balance of power. Unless we create a strong, unified and electorally overwhelming conservative coalition, the Left will continue to hold enough sway (even in a PC or Wildrose government) to keep Alberta well off the path of balanced budgets, health care reform and other needed changes.

Unification results in a combined core of conservative support of well over 50% of Alberta’s population. With this amount of support, a new unified conservative party won’t need to kowtow or acquiesce to the demands of left wing interest groups or the media. In fact just the opposite – the new party will only have to appeal to its economically conservative base…which just happens to be a majority of Albertans.

The result will be a stable, long term, majority, right-of-centre government committed to permanent tax reductions, balanced budgets, a vibrant energy and agricultural sector, cuts to billions in wasteful spending, a long-term debt repayment strategy, innovative market-driven health care reforms, and a host of other key policy initiatives that will ONLY be made possible with conservative unity.                  
#3 – Defending Alberta and Saving Canada from Trudeau

I’m not going to spend too much time explaining the train wreck that is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. It would take dozens of pages to outline the damage he has already rained down upon our country’s international reputation, economic competitiveness, energy sector, budget, negotiating position with the United States, etc, etc, etc. Needless to say, this guy is the worst possible combination of ego and cluelessness, and our nation will continue to suffer economically and in many other ways for as long as he sits in the PMO.

sigh...our Prime Minister
Alberta finds itself in a very precarious position…one not ever seen in our province’s modern history. We have a socialist Premier looking out for Alberta’s interests (if that’s what you want to call Premier Notley’s current strategy), while a Liberal Prime Minister (aptly named Trudeau) wreaks economic havoc on our province’s primary industry and job producer.

It’s the ultimate fox guarding the hen house scenario, and it clearly needs to change with the arrival of a conservative Alberta Premier at the head of a unified and here-to-stay Alberta conservative majority to guard and preserve our provincial rights and interests.

But it goes deeper than that. Over the last 50 years, Alberta has become the dominant driving force of the conservative movement in Canada. Not only has it produced most of the movement’s successful conservative leaders and driven many of the movement’s most important free market policy reforms, it has also been “home base” for the development of conservative policies, infrastructure, fundraising and effective political operatives.

It’s simple – with all due respect to Brad Wall (who I admire greatly) – the conservative movement in Canada has no chance of lasting success without a strong, vibrant and conservative-led Alberta. For Canada to get back on track and restore itself as an economically competitive and pro-growth country, Alberta needs to lead the way. And until Alberta conservatives are unified for the long term, Canada and its policy direction will likely be led by the likes of Justin Trudeau.    


For all the reasons stated above and many more, please put unifying Alberta’s conservative parties at the top of your list of New Year’s resolutions…the success of your financial resolutions for many years thereafter could very well depend on it!

Saturday, 26 November 2016

Letter of Apology to the Wildrose

Dear Wildrose Caucus, Staff, Members & Voters:

I’ve been trying to find the courage to write to you for some time now. I first wanted to sincerely thank-you for your work in holding the NDP Government to account. Your consistent opposition to their destructive agenda has been crucial and, I believe, will directly contribute to their ultimate replacement at the next election. As you well know by now, being in opposition is a very difficult and exhausting job – but what you are doing is absolutely critical for our province’s future and I hope you know how much your sacrifice towards this cause is appreciated.

I also wanted to write to ask for your compassion and understanding as I try to express to you my thoughts on a very sensitive and delicate matter.

As you are aware, a large number of Albertans, including, most notably, Mr. Jason Kenney, are seeking to merge the Wildrose and PC parties and the vast majority of their supporters into one conservative movement and party. I sincerely hope you will all consider contributing to this unity movement as much as you can. I believe it to be critical to the future of Alberta – and not just because it would mean defeating the NDP - but more importantly, it will allow the new unified party to form a strong and stable conservative majority capable of implementing a long term agenda of free market and other conservative policies that will return Alberta to economic prosperity and fiscal stability. Our province has not had this opportunity since the end of Premier Klein’s government, and I hope you will seize this historic opportunity for our beleaguered province.  

My primary reason in writing you today however, is to ask for your forgiveness for my involvement in what transpired in the failed late 2014 attempt to unify the PC and Wildrose caucuses.

Please make no mistake; every one of the MLAs involved was as devoted an Albertan as you will ever meet; committed to the same ideals and principles that you are fighting for now.  We had fought a long and exhausting battle against the very PC Party we grew up supporting and admiring, because we believed its leaders, at the time, had them moving in the wrong direction. As I am sure you are now understanding as you work alongside them, the vast majority of PC MLAs during this time period (like those in the Legislature today) were every bit as committed to Alberta and to conservative principles as we were, but there were grave differences as to the direction their leaders had chosen to pursue. Danielle, myself and the Wildrose MLAs, staff and members who we served with for those 6 years, felt we had to stand up and oppose what we believed to be some harmful policies at the time. We became quite an effective opposition, and did a lot of good work.

But the fight took its toll on many good people from both sides of the conservative family – some more than others of course. It was difficult fighting against fellow conservatives, so many of whom we truly admired and respected. Sadly, it became too personal for too many, and I certainly contributed my fair share of vitriol and took a lot of punches as well. That, more than anything, is one of the greatest regrets of my political career. My youth and energy during that time certainly brought with it a great deal of passion and effectiveness in driving public opinion and government policy at times, but I often let too much anger and overzealousness poison my rhetoric, and as a result, I contributed to several burnt bridges among conservatives. I often wish I knew then what I do now about the power of patience, listening, compassion and understanding. I’m thankful I had the opportunity to learn these lessons in my 8 years of politics – it’s made me a better person today - as painful as those lessons were to learn! Standing for what’s right doesn’t have to mean tearing down those who share a different view. In the long run, it’s often counterproductive to what you’re trying to ultimately achieve.

Needless to say, as time wore on over the years, many of us (certainly including me) became exhausted by the constant conflict and unending political partisanship and personal attacks launched in both directions.

When Premier Prentice was made leader of the PC Party, the tone changed completely. I truly admired him a great deal personally – so did we all. He made me and many of my colleagues believe that if we could look past our differences with those on the PC side and combine our efforts towards his new direction for the Government, we could implement so many of the policies we had been working towards for so long. He seemed to have this ability to help both our and his caucus members to see the best in one another. For the first 4 months of his tenure, it seemed like there was a real chance to put Alberta back on track – to form the long term sizeable majority necessary to repairing our finances, property laws, education and health care systems; and to do so by bringing the conservative family back together again.  We negotiated a list of bedrock Wildrose policies that we (along with our staff who we were promised would all be welcomed with open arms into the governing caucus) would be tasked by the Premier to implement as members of both the PC caucus and cabinet. The hope was that by implementing these policies over the 16 or so months before the next planned election, the Wildrose Party executive and members, after an invitation from the Premier to do so, would be convinced that this was the right direction and leader for the province, and would subsequently join the movement.  

Well, needless to say, it didn’t happen that way. The plan was fatally flawed to begin with and never carried out even if it hadn’t been.

We were wrong. Not in trying to bring the two caucuses together – that was the right thing to do (as is now clear to most). And I still believe Premier Prentice would have been an amazing leader for our province had things transpired differently (he was truly a great and forward thinking leader – may he rest in peace).

Where we went wrong was how we went about doing it. We should have been patient. We should have campaigned amongst our membership and constituencies and received a mandate to do it. We should not have charged ahead without remembering to consult with those we represented. It was two bold and brash a move without first preparing and asking permission from the membership of both parties. Maybe folks weren't ready to hear what we had to say about the need for unification (that was certainly the fear), but we could have tried - and we didn't.

Frankly, and speaking for myself, I was too na├»ve, exhausted, and wanted so badly to believe it was real; that the fight was finally over; that all the divisiveness of the past could be put behind us; and that we could work together with an exceptionally qualified leader at the helm, towards a better future for the province and my constituents.  

It has been almost 2 years since that fateful day in December of 2014, when we crossed the floor to join Premier Prentice and his caucus. I cannot begin to tell you how difficult much of this period has been for my colleagues, our families, and for me personally. I wish you could appreciate the endless sleepless nights, the tears shed, the confusion, the guilt, the fear and the feelings of utter helplessness that these MLAs and our families endured during that time. These are truly great men and women (and their beautiful families) who didn’t deserve what they had to endure. For the first several months, there were death threats, threats of physical violence and retribution, a constant barrage of vicious insults and a stream of social and mainstream media labelling us as traitors, power-mongers and every other name one can imagine.

Thankfully, for every insult thrown, there were many more in our communities there to provide a quiet kind word, a warm embrace, an invitation to an evening out or a firm handshake and “thank-you for your service.” Personally speaking, words cannot express how grateful Anita and I were and still are to these constituents and friends – including your very own Angela Pitt. We really don’t know how we would have made it through without them. And frankly, in many ways, I feel more a member and closer to my community today than I did as an MLA.

Over the last two years, I have seen and heard several of your MLAs, staff and party members attack the character and motives of these former MLAs (including myself) in the media and on television. I understand where it comes from – I really do. Perhaps some of it is deserved on my part. But I ask you sincerely to please stop. I am sorry; I made a mistake; I apologize. We, like many of you, only wanted to build a unified conservative movement that would get our province moving in the right direction again; but we certainly made a mistake in how we attempted to do so in the end.
We’re not bad people with traitorous motives or that lack in principle. Like you, we’re just regular Albertans who deeply love our province. We had some fantastic successes and certainly some epic failures, but we gave everything of ourselves and our families for many long years of dedicated service to our communities and our province.

My sincerest hope is that you, your staff and the members of your Party can find it in your hearts to forgive me and the others involved on both sides, and that one day we can all sit down together again as the friends we once were…and still should be.

All the very best to you and your families as you continue your great work.

Sincerely,

Rob Anderson

Former MLA - Airdrie

Saturday, 12 November 2016

Election 2016 - What Really Happened



Though I would not have supported Trump or Hillary (I preferred independent, Gary Johnson), Tuesday night was a wild and entertaining ride just the same. Watching a larger-than-life billionaire playboy from New York City win the Presidency by persuading millions of historically Democratic, mid-western blue-collar workers that he was their champion was a feat that even Houdini at his best could not have conjured.

But there it was - first Ohio, followed by Wisconsin, Michigan, and the final clincher...Pennsylvania. The Big Blue Democratic Wall didn’t just crack, it literally disintegrated with the entire presidential electoral map redrawn in a manner unthinkable just hours previous.

The reaction was predictable - the media (international and domestic) and left wing establishment lost its collective hive mind. Their on-air meltdowns looking and sounding like millions of outraged toddlers having their lollipops taken away at the same moment. The far right, on the other hand, sounding as smug and self-righteous as ever.

While this Election was certainly a historic upset, and one that will be remembered and studied for many decades, my hope is Americans (and Canadians) will take away the right lessons from it...and you certainly won’t learn those lessons from the utterly hopeless mainstream media north or south of the border.

Myth #1 - Trump’s win proves America is a Racist Nation

No one made more of a fool of themselves on election night than CNN commentator and professional race-baiter, Van Jones, who pinned the entire Trump win on what he termed a “Whitelash” of American white voters against Obama, African Americans and Hispanics. His statements, meant primarily to inflame racial tensions and divides (which he personally profits from enormously), were as ignorant as they were irresponsible.

First off, are we really to believe that the primarily white voters of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Ohio - who overwhelmingly supported President Obama twice (including once over native Michigan son Mitt Romney) somehow became collectively racist and decided to vent that racism by voting for some brash New Yorker against a white woman running for President?

Does anything in that assertion make any sense to any logically thinking human being?   

Secondly, Trump outperformed previous Republican hopeful Mitt Romney (the latter never accused of racism) soundly among African Americans, Hispanics and Asians. In Florida (the other election night surprise that was essential for Trump’s victory) he won 30% - THIRTY PERCENT -- of Hispanic votes.

In other words, Florida Hispanics handed Trump the presidency...please digest this for a moment.

Could it be that when Trump clumsily spoke of wanting to deport illegal immigrants who were committing crimes, many Hispanics knew that he was referring to those illegal immigrants that actually committed crimes such as rape and murder, and was not referring to the vast majority of Hispanic immigrants who are obviously good and law abiding citizens? The media spent thousands of hours of airtime trying to convince Hispanics and everyone else that Trump meant all Hispanics were rapists and murderers. Turns out that US Hispanics have far more sense and grasp of the English language than do the media simpletons that pollute our television airwaves.    

Myth #2 - Trump won Despite the Media Helping Hillary

False. A large part of the Trump win came because of the media.

I know first hand how effective the media can be at character assassination over the short term. Given a few days and a sliver of material to work with, they can convince the majority of the public that Mother Theresa is a serial killer.

And If this was a one month campaign, Trump wouldn’t have stood a chance. But for 2 entire years, the media relentlessly attacked Trump in every possible way imaginable. Some was true, some was exaggerated and out-of-context, and some ranged from false to batshit crazy.  

They called the husband of an immigrant wife...anti-immigrant. They called one of the most successful businessmen in America...a failed businessman. They called the man a woman-hating misogynist/quasi rapist while promoting a preferred First Couple that included the very embodiment of respect for women...Bill Clinton...oh, wait...

The fact is that after about 18 months, no one in America - other than the most partisan ...believed anything the media said about Trump or Clinton - including some accurate bad things about Trump, and some legitimate positive things about Clinton. We see this phenomenon in Canada with the CBC...when it comes to their coverage of politics, the vast majority of Canadians know they are systematically biased so they are simply not taken seriously by voters looking for legitimate information on which to base their vote.

Like the “Never Cry Wolf” fairy tail, the media became effectively ineffective...and made Trump the Teflon Don.
Myth #3 - Trump won a Massive Mandate

The right-wing commentators (there really is no right wing media unless you include the partisans at Fox News) were out in force stating that Trump’s victory constituted a huge mandate for both him and the Republican Party.

Ummm...no

Hillary, one of the worst possible candidates in modern American History, STILL beat Trump in the popular vote. With just a marginally better turnout among democrats in Philadelphia, Detroit, and Milwaukee, she would have probably gutted out the presidency.

Also troubling for Republicans should be the direction of Colorado, Nevada and Arizona (the former 2 going Hillary). Obviously, changing demographics (both in age and ethnicity) are moving those states towards the blue side of the spectrum. Republicans absolutely must find a better way to reach out to the young and to Hispanic voters.

They don’t need to do so with free handouts or useless platitudes. They need to do so by communicating a reasonable solution to the illegal immigration issue that doesn't terrify Hispanic families; they need to proactively seek out and support strong Hispanic candidates to run for them in ethnically diverse communities; they need to rebuild infrastructure in decaying new-immigrant neighbourhoods; and they need to categorically kick out any vestiges of lingering white supremacy in the GOP (and being anti-illegal immigration is not white supremacy!). Just as the Democrats house a small but loud number of racists and bigots who make their living fanning hate and fear between black and white America, so too do the Republicans have some members that seem to think that racism is somehow justifiable.

Trump needs to ruthlessly shame and push these knuckle draggers out of the GOP until they wake up and join the 21st century.

Myth #4 - Millions of Disaffected Americans will now flee to Canada

Look, I love Americans. I’m married to one (dual citizen actually). Millions of them are just down right awesome. But many are not that awesome at all. And if you think Canadians want a bunch of hyperventilating, sobbing, socialist, left wing leftovers flooding our streets, think again.

Unless you are coming because you want to actually be Canadian and contribute positively to our country...sorry, please just stay home eh.

That’s right stay home, and in 4 years you can work to...cough...make America Great Again!...heehee

 

Saturday, 28 November 2015

Alberta's "Health" Mafia at it Again!

Alberta Health Service’s decision to terminate the contract of Airdrie’s beloved physician & head of Airdrie Urgent Care, Dr. Julian Kyne, was not a personnel decision as AHS claims. 

Image result for dr. julian kyne
Dr, Julian Kyne - Airdrie's Head of Urgent Care
It was a mafia-style hit job of an individual who has advocated tirelessly for a 24-hour urgent care centre for Airdrie.

Earlier this year AHS brass were furious when Dr. Kyne, Mayor Brown, a group of local philanthropists and investors, the Airdrie Health Foundation and yours truly, went around the heel draggers at AHS to secure the commitment of government support (including a $4 million down payment) for a new 24-hour health centre. Then Health Minister Stephen Mandel was entirely committed to the project and had the political muscle to ensure it happened.

Big-hearted local family, Hugh and Loreen Hamilton, recently donated the land to the project and everything seemed set to go.

Image result for dr. julian kyne
Dr. Kyne, Minister Mandel, Mayor Brown, AHF chair Michelle Bates
and yours truly announcing 24-hour health centre for Airdrie last Spring
One problem, a few months ago the voters elected an NDP government, and all of a sudden Dr. Kyne no longer had political cover from a supportive minister, mayor and MLA in government.
That is when AHS took its revenge on Dr. Kyne.


AHS will of course deny this, but they are lying. And they should be ashamed. 


*Published in the Airdrie Echo and Airdrie City View (November 2015)

Sunday, 22 November 2015

NDP's Anti-Capitalist Ideology Trumping People's Health

When the NDP won the last election, the thinking went that since we were in Alberta after all, the Notley Government would be smart enough to realize that if they were to succeed long term, they had better govern pragmatically rather than inhabit the outer realms of reality that so many New Democratic faithful seem to live in including various ideological dogmas such as “corporations grow their money on special trees fertilized by the remains of abused workers” and “we can power our cars with unicorn farts”, etc, etc.

Well, it hasn’t turned out that way thus far.

The latest example of NDP ideology trumping logic is our health minister, Ms. Sarah Hoffman’s recent meltdown on the Airdrie 24-hour health care file.

As many of you know, the Airdrie Health Foundation, City Council, local health professionals, generous philanthropists, entrepreneurs and hundreds of community stakeholders and volunteers have been working relentlessly towards establishing a 24-hour urgent care centre for Airdrie. Earlier this year, our community broke through and secured the agreement of the provincial government to partner with local philanthropists and businessman to build a 3-floor health centre that would include 24-hour care, dozens of doctor’s offices, a pharmacy and other health services.

Then voters made – shall we say – an interesting choice in the last election and voted in an NDP government. Following the election, hopes were still high the promised Airdrie health centre would continue its progress. At last month’s Airdrie Health Foundation gala, for example, over $100,000 was raised and several acres of prime real estate was donated by the Hamilton family to the cause.
However, it seems increasingly apparent the NDP may not be in the mood to assist our City of 55,000 people to obtain 24-hour health care. 

This is evidenced not only by Alberta Health Service’s new found lack of enthusiasm for the project, but by the words of the health minister herself. When asked by Airdrie MLA, Angela Pitt, regarding the status of the 24-hour health centre, our health czar bizarrely began attacking not only the project but the Hamilton family who donated the land, stating “What we’ve done is worked with Alberta Health Services to have evidence based decision-making so that we can make sure that we’ve got assurances for all Albertans, not just individuals who can afford to donate land, that they will have health care when and where they need it.”

First off, I’ve been around enough to know the blurb about “evidence based decision making” is AHS code provided to the Minister with the meaning “Airdrie isn’t big enough and is too close to Calgary to justify 24-hour health care.” 

But secondly, what in hell is Hoffman saying here? Is she inferring this donation of land is tainted because it was made by a wealthy individual who would be able to afford private care if needed? Huh…ok. Or is it a thinly veiled threat that because the actual building would be constructed privately and the main floor leased or sold to AHS – that it is therefore not worth pursuing because...gasp…private money would make the project possible? Or is Ms. Hoffman being run by her ministry and AHS bureaucrats, and frankly has no clue what is even going on here (do you miss Minister Mandel yet? I do!)  

Frankly, who knows what she’s saying? But if this “star” cabinet minister supports Airdrie’s drive for 24-hour health care, she (and AHS who she oversees) better make it a bit more clear, and soon.

Sunday, 27 September 2015

Attack Ad Stupidity

You've seen it. You're at a party and some strange dude loudly declares he has a great joke to share with the room. Everyone quiets down to listen as he delivers it...and when he gets to the punchline...it falls completely flat. Dude laughs and says "Get It?", while everyone cringes, groans and moves away. 

Those who know the dude needle him a bit for being such a goof. Those who don't know him, say to each other "What a Loser" and try to avoid associating with him for the rest of the evening.

The party, in this little parable, is the 2015 Federal Election. The partiers are the national electorate. And the strange dude...the Conservatives and their utterly asinine anti-Trudeau ads.

If you haven't seen the "Job Interview" ad, it has these 3 “actors” (I use the term loosely) sitting around discussing whether they should hire Justin Trudeau as their Prime Minister. They go around the table stating how he apparently supports ISIS, has no experience and wants to legalize marijuana, among other sins. And then the punchline is some 60-something man looking at Justin's picture stating "Nice hair though" followed by the tag line "Justin Trudeau; he's just not ready." 

It's bad...real bad. Cringe worthy on so many levels. I can just see the ad's creators (likely five 20-something man-boys in short pants, laughing hysterically at their sheer brilliance).


The "Job Interview" Ad
Now let me be clear, I'm voting Conservative (I'm sure everyone is surprised). I'm like the strange dude's friend at the party who cringes at the joke, but knows that strange dude is still a good guy, even if he is a bit of a dork.

Look, nothing policy-related in the ad is incorrect (although the jab regarding ISIS is in bad taste). The reasons it is such a poor campaign ad are thus: it plays into the Harper Conservative stereotype of being a mean and unlikeable group run by childish political science majors in tight pants; it creates compassion and even a sort of defensiveness for Justin Trudeau; and most damning, it undercuts what should be a very strong Conservative record and message on the economy and international relations.     

But instead of seizing the opportunity to talk about having the strongest finances in the world, we're talking about Justin Trudeau's friggin’ hair!

There is, of course, a time to rip into the policies of Justin Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair - and it’s a target rich environment to be sure. But there are far more effective ways to use campaign commercials to point out those policy flaws without looking like goofy teenagers intent on damaging the Conservative brand long term. Not to mention the opportunities provided by debates, effective campaign surrogates, and plain ol' fashioned earned and social media, to take the high road and demonstrate why Harper is by far the best choice for Prime Minister of the available choices. 

Conservatives are supposed to be the adults in the conversation remember? Perhaps they should start acting like it.


Rob Anderson is an Airdrie lawyer with Warnock Rathgeber & Company and Airdrie’s former MLA.

Phone: 403-948-0009
Email: robanderson@wrlawyers.ca

Saturday, 5 September 2015

By-election Results Prove Need for Wildrose-PC Coalition

Wildrose now has 1 of 44 urban seats... 
As the NDP continue to damage Alberta’s economy by implementing policies that breed economic uncertainty and send investment and jobs fleeing to other now more competitive jurisdictions, the question now weighing on the minds of many is this; is it time to unite the Wildrose and PC parties into one small-c conservative party capable of beating Alberta’s growing leftist parties in 2019 and restoring economic prosperity and budgetary sanity to our quickly declining province?

The media is blindly parroting the simplistic message that the Wildrose victory in the recent by-election in Calgary-Foothills is a repudiation of Ms. Notley’s NDP, and Wildrose partisans claim this is evidence as to why there is no need for the victors to consider a long term relationship with their down-on-their-collective-luck PC cousins. That assessment is wrong headed. The by-election results are the clearest indication yet of the problem Alberta conservatives are facing.

Think about it. In one of the most reliably conservative urban ridings in Alberta, in the riding where Jim Prentice quit 5 minutes after his Party lost, with the economy in dire straits, a massive budget hole, hundreds of weekly layoffs, and NDP politicians across the country caught attacking Alberta’s oilsands on a daily basis, today’s leading conservative party, the Wildrose, wins…drum roll please…38% of the vote!

The NDP, who in the Calgary-Foothills by-election one year ago won a whopping 4% of the vote, finished second with 26%; and the PCs, given up for dead and running a rookie candidate with almost no party support, unbelievably still received 22% of the vote. This is a low water mark for the PCs – with any kind of a decent leadership race, the vote split on the right will only worsen making even this ultra conservative riding vulnerable.

Are you kidding me? This should have been a blowout.

So has anything changed since the NDP tsunami of the 2015 general election? Answer: no not really.
In both the general election and the by-election, the combined Wildrose/PC vote was 60%. The winning parties just switched places. The NDP finished with about the same percentage of the vote in both elections. 

It's telling that the primary NDP message in the final days of the by-election campaign was the argument that the PCs and Wildrose were very different, and that former PC voters should vote NDP. It didn't work of course. Half of the PC voters migrated to the Wildrose giving them the victory. But pay close attention to the Legislature over the next few years. You will see the NDP bend over backwards on the allocation caucus budgets, committee memberships and in the media to keep the PC brand as alive as possible, and the vote split active for as long as possible. In their defence, the PCs did this for years with the Liberals and NDP to great effect. The 'Dippers are just returning the favour...and guess who the suckers are now?   

Keep up the vote-splittin' boys!
The fact is that if a general province-wide election were held today, it is likely we would get roughly the same result we did 6 months ago. If the price of oil stabilizes the political gravy train, and the economy improves and settles down in 4 years…watch out folks…Ms. Notley will be celebrating an easy second term in office.

So is it time for the Wildrose and PC parties to talk a little cooperation and potential merger?

Of course it’s time! Are we to wait until the debt reaches $30 billion before getting our act together? $50 billion? $100 billion? Should we wait until Ms. Notley forever torches Gateway? Are we waiting for 10% unemployment and the energy industry becoming a shadow of its former self?

And what exactly are the current differences between the PC and Wildrose?

As someone who has been a member of both parties recently, allow me to let you in on a little secret…post Redford, there are no discernible differences.

Of course, there are those that disagree. A minority of left-leaning PC stalwarts still insist the Wildrose membership is a bunch of knuckle-dragging, hate-filled extremists.

That assertion is complete BS, and any ignoramus who still believes it needs to have their head carefully examined. 

Conversely, there are some hyper-partisans in the Wildrose who believe the entire PC Party and every member in it are corrupt, power hungry ingrates whose sole purpose is to enrich themselves on the backs of taxpayers.

Clearly there were PC entitlement issues after 40+ years of one party rule – most of which have been dealt with naturally by being defeated earlier this year. However, anyone who has met and worked with the actual human beings who have served as MLAs and volunteers in the PC Party, know full well that the vast majority are excellent people motivated by a desire to serve the province and communities they love.

The fact is the majority of members and MLAs in both parties believe in balanced budgets, low taxes, pro-energy policies that responsibly balance environmental concerns, educational choice, and a more decentralized health care system, just to name a few similarities.

Obviously, the attempted merger of last December failed. It did so for many reasons. First off, there was a power imbalance (one of the parties was the government, the other was not) which made it difficult to implement a true equal merger. Secondly and related, some of the people involved in the negotiations clearly had no intention to follow through with what was actually negotiated (such as implementing the agreed to policy document, hiring all Wildrose caucus staff, presenting a budget focused on spending cuts or waiting until 2016 to call an election…I could go on).

But the biggest reason it failed – and my single greatest regret – was a lack of transparency. The whole process, policy agreement, merger arrangement and all else should have been presented to the party memberships and Albertans to debate, alter and ultimately, to ratify. Not only would this have made the merger publicly acceptable, it would have forced all parties to act in good faith and follow through with the merger arrangement (like shareholders ratifying the negotiated merger of two companies).


The past is the past, but the future is unwritten. I hope the leaders and membership of the Wildrose and PC parties can learn from past mistakes, put aside their relatively small differences, and bring small-c conservatives together to fight for the Alberta we know and love. I fear that if we do not, we are putting the future prosperity of our children at inexcusable risk.